Side by side chaser |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
jbjeeps
Member Joined: 01 June 2013 Location: Idaho Status: Offline Points: 294 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here you go, not a side by side, need more juice, add a turbo kit, leave you BIL in the dust. https://rzr.polaris.com/en-us/rzr-rs1/
|
|
1970 CJ5 Dauntless, 4.88 (His)
1948 CJ2A Dauntless, 3.54 (Hers) 1948 CJ2A "Targhee", yup, still under construction but getting closer Instagram: old_money_2a   |
|
duffer
Member Joined: 02 Feb. 2012 Location: Bozeman, MT Status: Offline Points: 1089 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Naaaaaaa. The caveat is how the engine is built and the maturity of the ECU in charge of the right foot. Nothing like heaps of torque right at idle for rocks. As to the side by side debate, those UTV's come in a huge variety of forms. My wife and I finally bought a 2016 RZR 900 Trail a couple months back. Why??? Has something to do with the 50" trail limitations, something a Willys is never going to be successful meeting (and I did think about it). Our first RZR trail adventure was indeed a baptism and we found the limitations of the stock suspension/clearance. Since that trip, it has received a full 1/2" UHMW plastic skid plate, a 2" lift, and aftermarket springs (sound familiar?). Piloting it wasn't much different than the Jeeps except I lifted wheels more and slid over a lot more boulders on the skid plates. Speed rarely exceeded 5 mph. Would I have purchased a side by side if it wasn't for the 50" rule? Nope, not a chance.
|
|
1955 3B: 441sbc,AGE 4 speed transmission, Teralow D18w/Warn OD, 4.11:1 D44's/ARB's, glass tub & fenders, aluminum hood/grill, 8274, York OBA, Premier Power Welder; 67 CJ5: 225,T86AA, D18, 4.88's, OD
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |